Miles, RFCs are these:
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc6532.html http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc5322.html But I'd like you to know that I am not seeing any duplicated field *reply-to* in message header I received. Felipe Mafra [email protected] 2014-11-11 15:22 GMT-02:00 Miles Fidelman <[email protected]>: > Ok. As to whether others have problem - it really does depend on what > there antispam/antivirus setup looks like. > > A little googling tells me that the standard Amavis antivirus considers > multiple reply-to: lines as a "bad header" signature, and the standard > configuration quarantines messages with bad headers. > > The work around, for me, is obviously to play with the antivirus > configuration - but I think that Amavis only goes to the granularity of > quarantining all or none of the various BAD HEADER checks it performs. > Need to to a little research. I'm not sure I want to turn all of those off. > > I need to do some more research as to what is the RFC-compliant handling > of reply-to: headers by mail forwarders, if there is indeed any such spec. > It's pretty obvious that most list handlers and other forwarders either > delete them or rewrite them to things like original-reply-to: (the issues I > found by googling were mostly about things that broke when a piece of > software, e.g., a particular Drupal release, started sending messages with > duplicate reply-to: headers). > > Since this is a new behavior (unless I just wasn't noticing all that stuff > going straight to trash), I wonder if apache.org has changed or updated > its list or mail infrastructure. What does this list run on top of? > > Thanks, > > Miles Fidelman > > > > > Andy Wenk wrote: > >> I am a moderator of this list and I am not aware that listmaster is known. >> So if there are any issues it's ok to just write it here and a moderator >> will take care if needed. And yes infra is short for infrastructure. >> >> Let's see if others do have the same issue with this list. If yes I will >> take action :) >> On Nov 11, 2014 5:18 PM, "Miles Fidelman" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Well, I cc'd listmaster and postmaster - or are there other contacts to >>> use? And what does INFRA stand for (infrastructure?). >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Miles >>> >>> Andy Wenk wrote: >>> >>> The cool folks from apache who take care of everything related to the >>>> infrastructure of all the apache projects and of the ASF itself :). In >>>> this case also the mailing lists ... Aka sysadmins ;-) >>>> On Nov 11, 2014 5:00 PM, "Miles Fidelman" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Umm... who or what is INFRA? >>>> >>>>> Andy Wenk wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>>> I personally don't have this problem. But if others are faced with >>>>>> this, I >>>>>> will report it to INFRA . >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> >>>>>> Andy >>>>>> On Nov 11, 2014 3:17 PM, "Miles Fidelman" <[email protected] >>>>>> > >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Recently, I've been finding a lot of coucdb related email traffic >>>>>> in >>>>>> my >>>>>> >>>>>> spam folder. I think it's just the dev list, but I'm not 100% sure of >>>>>>> this >>>>>>> (I seem to recall this for other traffic, but intermittently, and the >>>>>>> latest batch is fine). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On examination, I find that our local antivirus/antispam setup is >>>>>>> reporting this: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION Duplicate header field: >>>>>>> "Reply-To" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is anybody else seeing this. If yes, is perhaps the list software >>>>>>> misconfigured, perhaps following a patch to address DMARC breakage? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Miles Fidelman >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >
