[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14214089#comment-14214089
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on COUCHDB-1175:
-----------------------------------------

GitHub user olafura opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/284

    Backport Accept check from chttpd

    Backport "Accept check" from chttpd to correctly handle when browser
    try to access a database when they aren't logged in or need to change their 
login
    
    This fixes so many bugs that have been littering the bug system for years.
    
    The problem was that browsers over promise and we were using that to check
    if it was json or html. I have another patch that is only 4 lines added and 
two
    changed but since it was changed in chttpd I thought merging that was the 
best
    thing.
    
    Also if this patch doesn't get accepted I have an other solution in a form 
of allowing
    rewrite to change headers.
    
    This closes #283
    
    COUCHDB-1175
    COUCHDB-2435

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/olafura/couchdb 1.x.x

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/284.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #284
    
----
commit cedb1c3f31c79b99819aa4f9376f4ebd3b8bc4d5
Author: Olafur Arason <[email protected]>
Date:   2014-11-16T20:03:20Z

    Backport Accept check from chttpd to correctly handle when browser
    try to access a database when they aren't logged in or need to change
    their login

----


> Improve content type negotiation for couchdb JSON responses
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: COUCHDB-1175
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1175
>             Project: CouchDB
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.2
>            Reporter: Robert Newson
>            Priority: Blocker
>
> Currently we ignore qvalues when negotiation between 'application/json' and 
> 'text/plain' when returning JSON responses.
> Specifically, we test directly for 'application/json' or 'text/plain' in the 
> Accept header. Different branches have different bugs, though. Trunk returns 
> 'application/json' if 'application/json' is present at all, even if it's less 
> preferred than 'text/plain' when qvalues are accounted for.
> We should follow the standard.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to