I guess you have to follow all the discussions in the ML archive ... On 7 January 2015 at 17:36, Alexander Shorin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Expected to read technical overview and why HTTP/2.0 is bad with > references to all his flaws and improvement proposals, with some > detailed analysis, but read something weird about politics instead. > Very upset. May be anyone knows such work to share? > -- > ,,,^..^,,, > > > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Andy Wenk <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > this is an interesting read by Poul-Henning Kamp about HTTP/2.0 and the > > "Last Call: for <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer > > Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard" > > > > "Thumbs down for HTTP/2.0" says +Poul-Henning Kamp > > <https://plus.google.com/107062646942244847362> > > http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=2716278 > > > > You can follow the thread here: > > > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2015JanMar/0043.html > > > > Cheers > > > > Andy > > > > -- > > Andy Wenk > > Hamburg - Germany > > RockIt! > > > > GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588 > > > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc > -- Andy Wenk Hamburg - Germany RockIt! GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588 https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc
