On 26 January 2015 at 22:42, Dirkjan Ochtman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: > > I’m also in favour of getting Nano into the Apache CouchDB fold. > > I'm curious; would you like to bring more CouchDB libraries into the > Apache project proper? Why do you think that would be an improvement? > What are the advantages to both the CouchDB project and a random > library project? > my understanding is, that nano is not only a random library but the most widely used library to communicate with CouchDB. The approach here is to not let the library die and there is already a maintainer who is supporting the move. Hopefully he will stay with the project ;-) But I can understand your concerns and we already had discussions about how to further maintain our own library which is used in Futon. Cheers Andy > > Cheers, > > Dirkjan > -- Andy Wenk Hamburg - Germany RockIt! GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588 https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc
