On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Robert Kowalski <[email protected]> wrote: > Alex: I think people who are not interested in reviewing PRs now will > not be interested anyway, no matter which channels we try to enforce. > We are currently channeling all mails for PRs to dev and since months > I am getting reviews from the same group of persons.
Indeed, but those who are shouldn't suffer from the spam which happens in commits@ . Please note, the GH notifications aren't just automatically generated emails: you can reply on them and those replied will be synced with GH. So you're able to lead a discussion right from your email client. The most compromise solution looks for me as a separate ML. We collection the stats for every board report. If it won't be much popular/useful we'll just shut it down and move these stuff to commits@, but with really insurance that nobody cares/use ML for GH conversations. What's the reviews are constantly made by the same group of persons is a separate issue. -- ,,,^..^,,,
