+1: 5 +0: 1 -1: 0 The vote passes. Thanks everybody, I’ll kick off the paperwork.
Best Jan -- > On 11 Mar 2015, at 19:57, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On 05 Mar 2015, at 18:49, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> between https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/305 and >> https://github.com/klaemo/docker-couchdb/issues/22 I was wondering whether >> the docker-couchdb project would be up for donating their effort to us and >> to take over maintenance. @klaemo is up for it and we are only waiting for >> the one other significant contributor to give their OK. >> >> With that out of the way: do we want this? >> >> Docker can be used in two capacities for CouchDB: >> >> 1. spin up a dev environment with all dependencies quickly. >> 2. spin up a production instance of CouchDB that is all self-contained. >> >> Our current Dockerfile serves 1., but is poorly maintained, and >> klaemo/docker-couchdb serves 2, and @klaemo hinted at being interested in >> taking over maintenance of 2. >> >> I’d be in favour of having some Docker experience in-house that can maintain >> both use-cases and cross-share any developments. >> >> If I hear no objections here, I’ll move to a vote. > > Thanks everyone for your input! > > Let’s go to a formal vote: > > Do we want to import the docker-couchdb project? > > I am +1. > > Best > Jan > -- > > -- Professional Support for Apache CouchDB: http://www.neighbourhood.ie/couchdb-support/
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
