Thanks for all your feedback!

How about this:

We create new mailing list [email protected] (or your favourite bike 
shed) that gets all JIRA and GitHub traffic.

dev@ then is for discussion and decisions for all code projects (including 
Fauxton).

If you want to keep track of tickets and pull requests, sign up for code@.

There is a bit of a discrepancy between discussions in JIRA and dev@, but I’m 
willing to take that risk, as most people probably bulk-delete all JIRA mails 
anyway :)

What do you think?

Best
Jan
-- 



> On 18 Feb 2015, at 15:41, Robert Kowalski <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I like the cross-pollunation between the dev-topics, e.g. when we
> announced / suggested coding style guidelines, I would like to keep
> that  at the main dev-list
> 
> I also think the amount of git-commit-mails and Jira stuff is floody.
> 
> Can we just move the Jira and git-commit stuff to an own mailing list?
> 
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Andy Wenk <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 18 February 2015 at 15:15, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 18 Feb 2015, at 15:12, Andy Wenk <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Jan,
>>>> 
>>>> I am +0. Recently, there is not that much traffic at dev@. So I am
>>>> wondering what the intention is to split technical discussions further.
>>> We
>>>> saw in the last year, that the main list is dev@ for developing on
>>> CouchDB.
>>>> The only list with much traffic is marketing@ because it is a complete
>>>> different topic.
>>> 
>>> This is mostly about the git notifications, they are significant :)
>>> 
>> 
>> ok fair point ... I just have the fear, that the participation will
>> decrease because of yet another ML a developer has to subscribe to. But we
>> can inform every one appropriately ... so let's go for it ...
>> 
>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Unless I am missing something essential like to much different topics in
>>>> one list, I would leave it at dev@.
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers
>>>> 
>>>> Andy
>>>> 
>>>> On 18 February 2015 at 14:38, Garren Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> +1 that is a good idea.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 18 Feb 2015, at 3:34 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hey all,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I’m wondering how you would feel to give the Fauxton team their own
>>>>> mailing list for discussions and GitHub notifications?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> In my view, the Fauxton project is generating enough traffic to warrant
>>>>> it’s own space :)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I’d propose [email protected]
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Best
>>>>>> Jan
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Andy Wenk
>>>> Hamburg - Germany
>>>> RockIt!
>>>> 
>>>> http://www.couchdb-buch.de
>>>> http://www.pg-praxisbuch.de
>>>> 
>>>> GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588
>>>> 
>>>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Andy Wenk
>> Hamburg - Germany
>> RockIt!
>> 
>> GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588
>> 
>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc

-- 
Professional Support for Apache CouchDB:
http://www.neighbourhood.ie/couchdb-support/

Reply via email to