> I throw in another idea and do suggest to use Confluence at: > * we do not have to set up anything - we can start NOW
Opened Confluence editor and played a little – and surprisingly I like this idea. Moreover, seems it‘s very good match, far better than longread-intended Medium or pre-alpha state Inliner. ermouth 2015-09-16 13:10 GMT+03:00 Andy Wenk <andyw...@apache.org>: > I throw in another idea and do suggest to use Confluence at: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COUCHDB/Apache+CouchDB+Wiki > > * we have that already set up > * it is run and supported by the ASF (INFRA) > * everyone with an account can create pages > * you can upload images easily > * everyone with an account can comment > * we do not have to set up anything - we can start NOW > > Thoughts? > > Cheers > > Andy > > P.S.: @ermouth: I like Inliner, > P.P.S: personally, I don't like medium at all due to some bad experiences > I made last week. The commenting does not support code and the UX is > horrible (and faulty). > > > On 16 September 2015 at 06:53, Johs Ensby <j...@b2w.com> wrote: > > > Michelle, > > suggest Medium account with ... > > > > "Email notifications on your content > > ( We’ll email you when there’s notifications on your stories and > > publications.)" > > > > ... set to design@ to comply with ASF policy as per Alexander's concern > > > > Alexander, > > I support you on encouraging ermouth suggestion to use Couch/Pouch based > > Inliner app as bases for this. > > Agree that is not crazy at all, on the contrary. I am using Inliner now > > and it is a very good candidate to extend into Medium-like community app. > > Integration with AFS mailing list would then be possible to customize for > > "backward compatibility" while entering the area that arrived when social > > media supplemented email). > > > > Medium, however has an excellent model for commenting that could be > > improved on and seen as the pilot exercise for including designers in the > > community. > > (I presume Michelle's ambition is to attract a new group of contributors, > > not only teach the non-desginers about design) > > > > johs > > > > > > > > On 14. sep. 2015, at 17.41, Alexander Shorin <kxe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Good morning, Michelle! > > > > > > That's really good idea to choose better platform for target audience > > > which simplifies main use cases. Should be interesting experiment (: > > > > > > The problem could be with the policy that all the ASF project > > > discussions should happens on ASF mailing lists. So, with using > > > thirdparty service, we need to workaround this somehow. That means > > > don't throw too far away your idea with design@ ML. > > > > > > Cannot say anything good or bad about medium or else platform, but +1 > > > such turn of events. > > > > > > -- > > > ,,,^..^,,, > > > > > > > > On 14. sep. 2015, at 22.09, Alexander Shorin <kxe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Use CouchDB-based service to work on CouchDB....That's not much crazy, > > > but win-win idea and ideal case (; > > > In the end, designers would be able to shape this service in the way > > > they prefer for the effective workflow. > > > > > > The only question is how much time/effort it would take to get it to > > > the minimal usable state? And, since we stated talk about features, > > > what are end users expectations and requirements for such service > > > (minimal, good to have, sweet spot)? > > > > > > -- > > > ,,,^..^,,, > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:49 PM, ermouth <ermo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> more ideas? > > >> > > >> Michelle, you may say I‘m crazy, but... What if we: > > >> > > >> - take this proto http://bit.ly/1iqHRt8 (works well in Chrome, FF, > O) > > >> hosted on Cloudant, > > >> - improve it to usable state, > > >> - add comments, > > >> - add registration using social networks, > > >> - make it fly. > > >> > > >> We may even enforce comments to start with ‘Yes, and ’ – bit crazy > idea, > > >> but it could be interesting social experiment ) > > >> > > >>> I am meaning the View part of the MVC > > >> > > >> CouchDB is extremely effective for MVVM architectures as well. Above > > >> example and ddoc.me/lab are both MVVM. > > >> > > >> ermouth > > >> > > >> 2015-09-14 21:34 GMT+03:00 Michelle Phung < > miche...@linux.vnet.ibm.com > > >: > > >> > > >>> Hi Eli, > > >>> > > >>> Yes, by design, I am meaning UI/UX/CHI/visual design. > > >>> I am meaning the View part of the MVC. :) > > >>> > > >>> I was meaning initially to create a space for people to give Fauxton > > >>> design suggestions, but we also have to consider the design of the > > website, > > >>> and also design of supporting documents, etc. > > >>> > > >>> Here is an example that Robert Kowalski shared with me: > > >>> https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/37 that i think is a helpful > > >>> example. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Michelle > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>> On Sep 14, 2015, at 1:36 PM, Eli Stevens (Gmail) < > > wickedg...@gmail.com> > > >>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> It would be helpful for me (and perhaps others, I think) if more > > >>>> examples/details were given about the intended audience and use. > > >>>> > > >>>> The emphasis on screenshots makes me suspect that "design" means > > >>>> "UI/CHI/visual design" rather than "software architecture," but it's > > >>>> still not clear exactly what would be considered on-topic for the > > >>>> proposed space (Fauxton? Couchapps? Anything with a CouchDB > backend?). > > >>>> > > >>>> To my old-fashioned MVC brain, the model is separated from the view > by > > >>>> the controller, which means that the choice of backing store doesn't > > >>>> impact the UI much. What criteria could I use to know if my project > is > > >>>> on topic? > > >>>> > > >>>> I'm mostly interested because I'd like to know if I should lurk > there > > >>>> too or not. :) > > >>>> > > >>>> Thanks, > > >>>> Eli > > >>>> > > >>>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Alexander Shorin <kxe...@gmail.com > > > > >>> wrote: > > >>>>> Good morning, Michelle! > > >>>>> > > >>>>> That's really good idea to choose better platform for target > audience > > >>>>> which simplifies main use cases. Should be interesting experiment > (: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> The problem could be with the policy that all the ASF project > > >>>>> discussions should happens on ASF mailing lists. So, with using > > >>>>> thirdparty service, we need to workaround this somehow. That means > > >>>>> don't throw too far away your idea with design@ ML. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Cannot say anything good or bad about medium or else platform, but > +1 > > >>>>> such turn of events. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -- > > >>>>> ,,,^..^,,, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Michelle Phung < > > michel...@apache.org> > > >>> wrote: > > >>>>>> Hello, > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I would like to open an account on a platform for CouchDB > designers, > > >>> design advocates, and design enthusiasts. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> It is a place to discuss all things design related with respect to > > >>> CouchDB. > > >>>>>> It could be a good place for people to learn about design. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> there are some design threads on github, which let people comment, > > and > > >>> it supports inline comments with screenshots, but maybe some > designers > > are > > >>> not on github. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> medium.com is another option. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> more ideas? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Michelle Phung > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > -- > Andy Wenk > Hamburg - Germany > RockIt! > > GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588 > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc >
