Johs, Let me please show the steps needed.
* discuss the feature very clearly on the dev@. Please make sure that core developers as committers with commit bits are involved * code the feature. Make sure to implement tests * send a pull request and show it to dev@ * finally the community will accept or decline the feature (this will involve refactoring and changes) As Alex said. The PMC or Jan do not decide about the feature. All the best Andy On 1 Oct 2015 11:21, "Alexander Shorin" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Johs Ensby <[email protected]> wrote: > > will you welcome ermouths rewrite contribution? > > The decision is depends on the implementation. If it will be good, why > not? Finally, CouchDB is open source project: we cannot forbid people > right for contributions, we only welcome them. > > > Arguments against couchapps has to do with performance and the folly in > competing with node.js. > > Performance question for the new _rewrite implementation is very > depends on query server. Once it can process this kind of functions, > you may use something better than JS to gain better performance. That > could be Erlang native query server, or luerl-based one, or else you > like. > > -- > ,,,^..^,,, >
