On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Nick North <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not exactly sure what you are proposing here. Are you saying we should > run autoconf for the snappy code? There is an earlier commit in > couchdb-snappy repository that removed autotools, saying they did not work > well with snappy, which makes me a bit cautious about that. Apologies if > I've misunderstood your suggestion,
That's the one of the solutions, but will require to: 1) integrate autoconf run from rebar 2) make autoconf as build dependency 3) ... and all these just for a few C++ types? I proposed to add preprocessor conditional to catch Windows case and inject the right code to make snappy works. Basically, unfold autoconf conditions manually. That's the idea. I'm not sure if this will help, but worth to start from there. -- ,,,^..^,,,
