Thanks, Garren, I’ll look for that in the latest release. But for this, I’d certainly prefer us to migrate to 2.x Cheers, Kai
On 5 July 2018 at 11:16:11, Garren Smith (gar...@apache.org(mailto:gar...@apache.org)) wrote: > Hi Kai, > > Fauxton now supports a table view which allows you to see many documents at > once as well as choosing which key values to see in the table. Its been out > for a while so I'm sure its in the current release but will definitely be > in the next. > > Cheers > Garren > > On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 9:32 AM, Kai Griffin <k...@resourceandrevenue.com> > wrote: > > > As developers who spend a lot of time in the CouchDB web interface, we > > have held back moving to CouchDB 2.x only because of the change from Futon > > to Fauxton. We feel that Fauxton simply does not meet the needs of > > developers as well as Futon did. It seems to be targeted more at non-devs: > > it’s very friendly-looking, modern & pretty, but is biased towards > > prettifying document JSON, at the expense of being able to scan through > > many unformatted documents, which Futon does by default. > > > > So, mainly comes down to the inability to properly see the contents of > > documents without opening up documents individually. We like to see the > > whole, unformatted document when viewing a list of documents (or, in the > > case of looking at a View, then whatever the map script outputs, but in an > > unformatted form, not prettified like Fauxton). Futon is more compact & > > developer friendly, even if to a non-dev, such views might look like a > > jumble of unformatted text. At very least, some kind of “classic mode” > > switch would be greatly welcomed, at least by us :-) > > > > Please note that it’s been awhile since I’ve looked at CouchDB 2.x, and > > the issue I brought up above might well have been addressed by someone in > > the meantime, so apologies if I’m dredging up old/non-relevant stuff (in > > which case we’ll happily jump onto 2.x!) > > > > > > On 5 July 2018 at 09:21:37, Andrea Brancatelli (abrancate...@schema31.it) > > wrote: > > > > Well, mine is the lack for a working FreeBSD port for CouchDB 2.x... > > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218844 > > > > On 2018-07-05 09:10, Johs Ensby wrote: > > > > > This thread reach out to CouchDB 1.x users to generate a list of > > > "must-fix" issues that is preventing users to upgrade to the latest > > > version of CouchDB. > > > > > > It is in response to Joan's comment below regarding the > > > non-technical proposal to make a project decision to terminate > > > official Apache support for CouchDB 1.x. > > > > > > > On 5 Jul 2018, at 06:31, Joan Touzet <woh...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > As for things in 2.x that are "must fix" before people can upgrade, I > > > > too would like to see pull requests for those. Once again, your help > > is > > > > most welcome in this - both in identifying a definitive list of those > > > > must-fix issues, as well as code towards fixing them. If you'd like > > > > to help with this important work, please start a new thread. > > > > > > Mine is CouchDB as a proxy. > > > The feature described here is not working in 2.1.1 > > > http://docs.couchdb.org/en/2.1.1/config/proxying.html?highlight=_proxy > > > > > > Johs > >
