>
> As to your wishlist - let's break that off to a different discussion,
>

Thanks Joan!

Totally agreed, I didn't mean those to be Roadmap proposals, merely
'justifications', in a sense, of things I saw likely becoming easier for me
to "get into" as a consequence of the FDB change over; which helped me lean
into really supporting the FDB proposal generally.  I also felt they were
items not necessarily on the roadmap, and am not sure they should be, so
that FDB could make them easier for me was part of what made this FDB
proposal appealing.

The main points I was making were about "why" this seems like a "good idea"
to me:

1) The expectation/understanding that the CouchDB project would be bringing
FDB behavior in as a pretty core part of the community/culture as a
consequence, and that it appears the teaching materials exist to help us
succeed there;

2) The appearance of lowering the learning curve for me to get into
exploring that "wishlist" of ideas;

3) The general removal of code that is "required but not a central focus"
of the project's spirit in favor of a project that seems to focus more
narrowly on that particular job "better", is likely to evolve/improve, and
add backend flexibility;

4) The generalized confidence of the champions/supporters that this is
likely going to make things better more than it makes things worse.  In
general I feel like without some kind of change of this kind, the overall
database capabilities and future growth of the project would be held back
more than helped.  I agree with Robert's comment that in addition to the
apparent benefits they are already thinking of, making this change also
ensures the abstraction layers have been successfully designed and
implemented to actually make a change like this.  So go team, I'm in favor
of "kicking the tires" / "testing" how well all that work and effort that
was put into making something like possible has turned out.

------
I hope that clarifies "why" I had that wishlist of items there; I wasn't
trying to create a discussion of them on this thread. :-)

Thanks!
Mike

Reply via email to