It’s certainly a pain to get the Helm maintainers to approve Pull Requests, so I’m glad to see a strategy here.
Is the Helm team providing any CI assistance to self-hosted repositories? Part of me wonders if ASF would want to host a repository to which all projects could contribute but I don’t personally feel like spending the cycles to find out :) I’m quite ok with CouchDB hosting its own. Adam > On Sep 26, 2019, at 12:18 PM, Will Holley <willhol...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > CouchDB has a mature Helm chart at > https://github.com/helm/charts/tree/master/stable/couchdb to facilitate > deploying CouchDB clusters to Kubernetes. Historically, Helm charts have > been curated by the Helm team alongside a list of chart-specific > maintainers (@kocolosk in this case). > > The Helm team have indicated that the current monolithic repository > approach is unsustainable for them and have started asking chart owners to > move to self-hosted repositories (most commonly GitHub pages - > https://github.com/helm/hub/blob/master/docs/github.md). These are then > aggregated at http://hub.helm.sh. > > What do people think about moving the CouchDB chart from the helm/charts > Git repository into an Apache-owned repository (e.g. > github.com/apache/couchdb-helm) to complement the existing > apache/couchdb-docker repository? > > If there's appetite for this I can move to a vote. > > Thanks! > > Will > > p.s. for those interested, the workflow for deprecating the existing chart > is described at > https://github.com/helm/helm/blob/master/docs/charts.md#deprecating-charts.
