Nice, make check-fdb passes for me on that branch (the 2nd time, the 1st time 
was a spurious failure, timing related).

B.

> On 30 Mar 2020, at 22:04, Robert Samuel Newson <rnew...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Great timing, I merged something to prototype/fdb-layer without the check 
> passing, I'm trying this now.
> 
> First note, the kerl line doesn't work but it seems there's a system wide 
> erlang 20 install instead.
> 
> B.
> 
>> On 30 Mar 2020, at 19:50, Joan Touzet <woh...@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi everyone, hope you're all staying at home[1].
>> 
>> I've just pushed out a new version of our 
>> couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all Docker image. This now includes the fdb 
>> binaries, as well as client libraries and headers. This is a necessary (but 
>> not sufficient) step to getting the fdb prototype merged to master.
>> 
>> Can someone please test if this works correctly for them to build and test 
>> CouchDB (with fdb)?
>> 
>> Here's instructions:
>> 
>> docker pull couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all
>> docker run -it couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all
>> # then, inside the image:
>> cd
>> git clone https://github.com/apache/couchdb
>> cd couchdb && git checkout <whatever branch you want>
>> . /usr/local/kerl/20.3.8.25/activate
>> # you still need to fix make check, but Paul says this should work:
>> make check-fdb
>> 
>> The next step would be to fix `make check`. Then, you can merge the fdb 
>> branch to master.
>> 
>> CI on master will be broken after fdb merge until we get answers to these 
>> questions: [2].
>> 
>> **REMEMBER**: Any 3.x fixes should land on the 3.x branch at this point. If 
>> they're backend specific, there's no need for them to land on master anymore.
>> 
>> **QUESTION**: Now that we have a new feature (JWT), it's likely the next 
>> CouchDB release would be 3.1.0 - so, probably no need to land more fixes on 
>> 3.0.x at this point. Does everyone agree?
>> 
>> -Joan "I miss restaurants" Touzet
>> 
>> [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rORMGH0jE2I
>> [2]: https://forums.foundationdb.org/t/package-download-questions/2037
> 

Reply via email to