Hi All, I've checked SHAsums and GPG signature and they are correct. I've also done some end-to-end comparison to the latest docker image and there seems to be no regression.
And I'm interested to see the discussion addressing Richard Ellis' concerns as any post-release changes to the "location" of the new control (qs -> header) would require a major version (in semver-land). Thank you, Donat On Sat, 12 Sep 2020 at 00:53, Joan Touzet <woh...@apache.org> wrote: > > Dear community, > > I would like to propose that we release Apache CouchDB 3.1.1. > > Changes since the last round: > > https://github.com/apache/couchdb/compare/3.1.1-RC1...3.1.1-RC2 > > Candidate release notes: > > https://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/whatsnew/3.1.html > > We encourage the whole community to download and test these release > artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release > is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so dig right in! > (Only PMC members have binding votes, but they depend on community > feedback to gauge if an official release is ready to be made.) > > The release artefacts we are voting on are available here: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/3.1.1/rc.2/ > > There, you will find a tarball, a GPG signature, and SHA256/SHA512 > checksums. > > Please follow the test procedure here: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COUCHDB/Testing+a+Source+Release > > Please remember that "RC2" is an annotation. If the vote passes, these > artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 3.1.1. > > Because of the weekend, this vote will remain open until 5PM ET (UTC-4), > Tuesday, 15 September 2020. > > Please cast your votes now. > > Thanks, > Joan "once more unto the breech, dear friends" Touzet
