On 16/11/2021 17:53, Joan Touzet wrote:
On 16/11/2021 16:08, Nick Vatamaniuc wrote:
As for voting for making these proper releases, I am not really
looking forward to the SVN pushes, signing, checksumming, and
collecting votes for these deps.
Scriptable, shouldn't be hard if someone has time.
Especially for a NIF with just 2
functions in it. Wonder what can be simplified there. Can voting be
done in a GH release draft comments section as opposed a dev@couchdb.
No, all votes must be on the mailing list, sorry.
Just to add to this we're not supposed to use the GH release system for
any 'official' release, and in fact Infra is in talks with GH to have
that system disabled for all apache/* repos. I would absolutely avoid
using the GH release system as a basis for the Apache artefacts, and I'd
be worried that your scripting today could be undermined tomorrow.
I'm not saying that's right or wrong, it's just what I've heard. If you
have concerns, take them up with Infra directly.
Do we really think these apps are going to have a lot of churn and need
a lot of releases?
