Dear all

+1 from my side.


I did the following checks:

Checked:
- Downloaded archives, checksums and signatures
- GPG signatures on source and binary archives are correct
- SHA512 checksums on source and binary archives are correct
- Compiling from source works fine
- Running namenode, datanode and Crail client from compiled source works 
fine
  - ./bin/crail fs -touchz /bla
  - ./bin/crail fs -ls /
- Running namenode, datanode and Crail client from downloaded binaries 
works fine
  - ./bin/crail fs -touchz /bla
  - ./bin/crail fs -ls /


Thanks
Adrian





From:   "Jonas Pfefferle" <[email protected]>
To:     "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date:   11/13/2018 11:43 AM
Subject:        [VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc5]



Hi all,


We prepared a new release to address the issues found in rc4. This is a 
call 
for a vote on releasing Apache Crail 1.1-incubating, release candidate 5. 
The following issues has been addressed:

* Add licenses of all dependencies
* Update DiSNI and DaRPC version (they now also contain LICENSE files in 
their META-INF)

The source and binary tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be 
found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/crail/1.1-rc5/


The commit to be voted upon:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-crail.git;a=commit;h=eb8781e9b41b43188d939d3800ef19f8baf05dfe


The Nexus Staging URL:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecrail-1004/


Release artifacts are signed with the key AA557B11:
https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/crail/KEYS


For information about the contents of this release, see:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-crail.git;a=blob_plain;f=HISTORY.md;hb=eb8781e9b41b43188d939d3800ef19f8baf05dfe

or for better readability 
https://github.com/apache/incubator-crail/blob/v1.1-rc5/HISTORY.md


Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Crail 1.1-incubating

The vote will be open for 72 hours.

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Crail 1.1-incubating
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...

Thanks,
Jonas








Reply via email to