On 3/2/2020 9:54 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > Pretty much everything is appropriate for the dev list. (The main > exception being "personnel matters", e.g. voting for new committers.) > Even banal coordination, like "I've written the report but can't seem > to post it. Here it is. Can y'all review? Jonas, can you post it for > me?" belongs on the list. The dev list is the town square (or the > local coffee shop) of a project. >
Thanks Julian, got your point. Let's improve that. Bernard. > On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 12:41 PM bernard metzler <bmetz...@gmx.ch> wrote: >> >> On 3/2/2020 7:33 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: >>> Thanks for getting the report done on time. >>> >>> Next time, consider doing it everything on the dev list. It may seem >>> like a small thing, but Jonas and Bernard are clearly talking in a >>> back-channel, and that is alienating to the rest of us on dev. We >>> start wondering how much else we are missing. >>> >>> Julian >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 7:05 AM bernard metzler <bmetz...@gmx.ch> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 3/2/2020 15:55, Jonas Pfefferle wrote: >>>>> Bernard wrote the new podling report and I just added it. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Jonas >>>>> >>>> Thanks Jonas! I lost my Confluence password, and reset attempts >>>> are currently ending up in 'internal error'. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Bernard. >>>> >> Hi Julian, you are saying we shall better discuss the >> content on dev >> before entering the report? >> >> Would make lots of sense to me. I asked that myself, but I was unsure >> if that's appropriate. >> >> Thanks, >> Bernard.
