On 07/22/13 12:35, sebb wrote:
On 22 July 2013 06:15, P. Ottlinger <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
Am 21.07.2013 21:44, schrieb sebb:
I think we need to release 0.10 sooner rather than later.
Did we release 0.9 properly?
Dunno; probably too late now anyway.
Depends on what you mean by properly :-/
Officially, yes (the vote passed and the signed artefact was uploaded)
In terms of doing everything I usually do, then no
I didn't get any public announcement mail or something similar or is
that only done by bigger projects? But have graduated from Incubator
already ....
There was a long delay in getting the pub-sub mirrored distribution set
up. I think we were unlucky in that we were one of the first to try to
use this new system. Then I had a bad month or two health- and
work-wise, with almost no typing time beyond my job.
When we discussed pushing onwards and issues a public announcement and
so on, it seemed better to focus on getting an early 0.10 out...
What would be the 'big' differences between 0.9 and 0.10? Only the
performance problem while scanning licences and RAT-145?
See https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/creadur/rat/trunk/RELEASE_NOTES.txt
The main change is RAT-138 - Rat 0.9 could run much slower than 0.8 on
some input.
Robert
