On 11 September 2014 11:22, P. Ottlinger <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi guys, > > does anyone of you see the use case of blocking the reports?
Yes. If the site build includes the RAT report, how else does one suppress it? > On 2014-09-10 23:11, Chris Burroughs (JIRA) wrote: >> >> Chris Burroughs created RAT-173: >> ----------------------------------- >> >> Summary: skip property does not skip report >> Key: RAT-173 >> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-173 >> Project: Apache Rat >> Issue Type: Bug >> Components: maven >> Affects Versions: 0.11 >> Reporter: Chris Burroughs >> >> >> The skip property added in RAT-164 skips `check` but not `report`. > > > I understood RAT-164 to be okay for technical builds, but I do not really > see a point in not having the report written during a site:site run? > > Why would I want to use RAT if I skip it completely? This would be for a temporary override. Same as one can do for tests with -DskipTests > Thanks for your opinions, > > Phil > > >
