So the issue is that you want to be able to mark the new licenses as approved - is that correct?
On 16 September 2014 12:20, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> wrote: > I get report like this (some lines are omitted): > > 0 Unknown Licenses > > ******************************* > > Unapproved licenses: > > > /home/solomax/work/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/openmeetings-web/src/main/webapp/js/jquery.ui.menubar.js > > /home/solomax/work/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/openmeetings-web/src/main/webapp/css/theme_om/jquery-ui-1.10.4.custom.css > > /home/solomax/work/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/openmeetings-web/src/main/webapp/css/jquery.ui.menubar.css > > ***************************************************** > Files with Apache License headers will be marked AL > Binary files (which do not require AL headers) will be marked B > Compressed archives will be marked A > Notices, licenses etc will be marked N > AL > > /home/solomax/work/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/openmeetings-web/src/main/webapp/upload/library.xsd > AL > > /home/solomax/work/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/openmeetings-web/src/main/webapp/upload/library.xml > B > /home/solomax/work/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/openmeetings-web/src/main/webapp/default/_big_profile_pic.jpg > ...................................... > !MIT+GPL > /home/solomax/work/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/openmeetings-web/src/main/webapp/js/jquery.ui.menubar.js > ...................................... > !MIT > /home/solomax/work/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/openmeetings-web/src/main/webapp/css/theme_om/jquery-ui-1.10.4.custom.css > ...................................... > !MIT+GPL > /home/solomax/work/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/openmeetings-web/src/main/webapp/css/jquery.ui.menubar.css > ...................................... > > > On 16 September 2014 18:01, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 16 September 2014 08:04, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hello All, >> > >> > Sorry for the long email :( >> > >> > Today I added apache-rat-plugin (0.11) to our maven build ( >> > openmeetings.apache.org project) >> > We have couple of jQuery files in our sources licensed under MIT and >> > MIT+GPL and not recognized by apache-rat-plugin. >> > So I have added custom licences: >> > <licenses> >> > <license >> > >> implementation="org.apache.rat.analysis.license.SimplePatternBasedLicense"> >> > <licenseFamilyCategory>MIT+GPL</licenseFamilyCategory> >> > <licenseFamilyName>MIT and GPL v2</licenseFamilyName> >> > <notes></notes> >> > <patterns> >> > <pattern>Dual licensed under the MIT or GPL Version 2 licenses.</pattern> >> > </patterns> >> > </license> >> > <license >> > >> implementation="org.apache.rat.analysis.license.SimplePatternBasedLicense"> >> > <licenseFamilyCategory>MIT</licenseFamilyCategory> >> > <licenseFamilyName>MIT</licenseFamilyName> >> > <notes></notes> >> > <patterns> >> > <pattern>Licensed MIT</pattern> >> > </patterns> >> > </license> >> > </licenses> >> >> OK >> >> > <licenseFamilies> >> > <licenseFamily >> implementation="org.apache.rat.license.SimpleLicenseFamily"> >> > <familyName>MIT and GPL v2</familyName> >> > </licenseFamily> >> > <licenseFamily >> implementation="org.apache.rat.license.SimpleLicenseFamily"> >> > <familyName>MIT</familyName> >> > </licenseFamily> >> > </licenseFamilies> >> >> What happens if you omit the <licenseFamilies> section? >> >> > Unfortunately after that Apache licensed files are not approved any more >> > ******************************* >> > >> > Unapproved licenses: >> > >> > pom.xml >> > >> > ******************************* >> > >> > Archives: >> > >> > ***************************************************** >> > Files with Apache License headers will be marked AL >> > Binary files (which do not require AL headers) will be marked B >> > Compressed archives will be marked A >> > Notices, licenses etc will be marked N >> > !AL pom.xml >> > N CHANGELOG >> > N NOTICE >> > N README >> > N LICENSE >> > >> > >> > adding >> > <addDefaultLicenseMatchers>true</addDefaultLicenseMatchers> >> > also doesn't help >> > >> > Is there any option to add licences to default ones? >> > >> > Thanks in advance >> > >> > -- >> > WBR >> > Maxim aka solomax >> > > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax
