Note that if the docs are CC-SA, they could be handled externally and not bundled with the actual release. That is non-optimal, but may provide some breathing time to do a relicensing run.
> On Jun 12, 2015, at 2:15 AM, Henri Yandell <[email protected]> wrote: > > resolved.html says "Unmodified media", which was intended to mean images > (audio, video etc). > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-4 > > I wouldn't expect any of those to have a file header (and would question > whether resolved.html says Groovy docs can be CC-BY SA). > > On the more general question - I doubt there is a default file header. I > don't see anything suggested here: https://wiki.creativecommons.org/FAQ > > Presumably RAT has to be aware of the variants in general use and support > them all as it discovers them. > > Hen > > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:25 PM, P. Ottlinger <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi *, > > we've received a request to add a new license to Apache Creadur/RAT > (release audit tool). We are not sure which text needs to be included in > files to be properly CC-licensed? > > The page > https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#cc-sa > says that CC-SA is a valid license for Apache projects. > > What is a valid file header we need to scan for to properly mark it as > CC-licensed during RAT runs? > Is it > ' > THE WORK (AS DEFINED BELOW) IS PROVIDED UNDER THE TERMS OF THIS > CREATIVE COMMONS PUBLIC LICENSE ("CCPL" OR "LICENSE"). THE WORK IS > PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT AND/OR OTHER APPLICABLE LAW. ANY USE OF THE > WORK OTHER THAN AS AUTHORIZED UNDER THIS LICENSE OR COPYRIGHT LAW IS > PROHIBITED. > > BY EXERCISING ANY RIGHTS TO THE WORK PROVIDED HERE, YOU ACCEPT AND > AGREE TO BE BOUND BY THE TERMS OF THIS LICENSE. THE LICENSOR GRANTS > YOU THE RIGHTS CONTAINED HERE IN CONSIDERATION OF YOUR ACCEPTANCE OF > SUCH TERMS AND CONDITIONS. > ' > ? > > Thanks for any feedback before we start implementing this feature. > > Cheers, > Phil > > PS: Links for details: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-206 > >
