Hi, Am 12.11.2015 um 16:39 schrieb Sebb (JIRA): > Sebb created RAT-209: > ------------------------ > A license header is not usually required for short files that have no > creative content.
I do not really think that this feature is that useful since it adds some unclear "guessing" to the otherwise deterministic RAT runs .... what if we miss important files with that fuzzy rule?! If you insist on adding it I'd make it optionally configurable. Furthermore I'd prefer to add it after integration Apache Tika to detect the type of contents that is scanned .... Just my 2ct Phil
