Hi Jacques, all,

IANALE, and I don't think that this is a ASF Legal issue, but rather a 
political one. And how the configuration of RAT works with either choices (or 
both).

Best regards,

Pierre


On 2018/03/18 11:57:30, Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]> wrote: 
> Hi Pierre,
> 
> I see 2 solutions
> 
>   * Since we can find the license at 
> https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 => Creadur could allow this URL 
> in license header.
>   * Maybe not because it's how it's written in the license itself and you 
> need to change this URL in all your files which include the license header
> 
> I surmise the second answer is the right one, but IANAL
> 
> HTH
> 
> Jacques
> 
> 
> Le 18/03/2018 à 08:50, Pierre Smits a écrit :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As with any other Apache project we - at Apache Trafodion - have the Apache 
> > header in all our code artefacts.
> >
> > Now, recently we have started the endeavour to migrate away from linking to 
> > http:// links (insecure) to https:// (secure) for our project and ASF 
> > related pages.
> >
> > Unfortunately or RAT check complains that - during the transition phase - 
> > some files have the following
> >
> >    https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
> >
> > Can you help me with insights to fix this?
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Pierre Smits
> > Apache Trafodion contributor
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 

Reply via email to