On Sat, 1 Jun 2019 at 19:11, P. Ottlinger <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> thanks for the reminder - I'll file a RAT issue for that and after
> changing all of RAT's jobs file an issue with infra to get rid of RAT's
> SVN completely.

I don't think it's a good idea to delete SVN.
It may be needed for historic analysis etc.

However it may be sensible to rename it so it cannot be used by mistake.

e.g. create
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/creadur/_moved_to_git/
and move
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/creadur/rat/
to
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/creadur/_moved_to_git/rat/

This will allow access to the historic SVN repo if necessary.

Possibly create
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/creadur/rat/README.txt which points
to the Git location.

It would certainly be sensible to update the RAT website so the Source
Repo links are accurate:
https://creadur.apache.org/rat/source-repository.html

> That won't solve the Travis issue, but hopefully fix ASF-Jenkins
> problems :-)
>
> Thanks again!
>
> Phil
>
> Am 01.06.19 um 14:20 schrieb sebb:
> > On Sat, 1 Jun 2019 at 12:17, sebb <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> One of the Jenkins builds is still using SVN
> >>
> >> https://builds.apache.org/job/Creadur-Rat-Site-Latest-Jdk/
> >
> > Actually it looks like the only build that is using Git is:
> >
> > Creadur-Rat
> >
> >> The builds should either be dropped, or modified to use the
> >> appropriate Git branch.
> >>
> >> Perhaps worth checking all the Creadur builds:
> >> https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/Creadur/
> >>
> >> S.
>

Reply via email to