Yes, another PMC review please, pretty please.

Gary

On 2022/09/13 07:04:19 "P. Ottlinger" wrote:
> Hi guys,
> 
> we are lacking one positive vote to get the release out .... it seems 
> that some PMC members are not available at the moment to do the release 
> vote.
> 
> Pls find some time to play with 0.15 in order to get it published publicly.
> 
> Thanks,
> Phil
> 
> 
> -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
> Betreff: [VOTE] Release Apache Creadur RAT 0.15
> Datum: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 23:24:39 +0200
> Von: P. Ottlinger <[email protected]>
> Antwort an: [email protected]
> An: [email protected], [email protected]
> 
> Dear friends of RAT,
> 
> the new v0.15 fixes 5 issues and I've staged a new release 0.15.
> 
> =View on 0.15=
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/RAT/versions/12351647 (you 
> need to login)
> 
> * 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20RAT%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.15
> 
> * https://github.com/apache/creadur-rat/releases/tag/apache-rat-project-0.15
> 
> =Staging area=
> 
> In order to use the staged release add this snippet to your pom:
> <pluginRepositories>
>       <pluginRepository>
>           <id>staged-releases-rat-015</id>
> <url>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecreadur-1008/</url>
>       <pluginRepository>
> </pluginRepositories>
> or browse
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecreadur-1008/org/apache/rat/
> directly.
> 
> =VOTE is open until 2022-09-06 12:00 UTC=
> Everyone is encouraged to vote, express their opinions and jump in if
> they find anything wrong with the release. Only PMC votes are binding
> on Apache, and for this candidate to become an official Apache
> Software Foundation release 3 +1's are required and more +1's than
> -1's.
> 
> This vote is open for at least 72 hours,
> 
> [ ] +1
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1
> 
> until 2022-09-06 12:00 UTC.
> 
> NOTE
> The downloads page and RAT webpage is not yet changed to reflect changes 
> in 0.15 and the dist area does not yet contain the release artifacts.
> 
> Thanks,
> Phil
> 

Reply via email to