[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17805493#comment-17805493
]
Maxim Solodovnik commented on RAT-343:
--------------------------------------
[~claude] I've tried to add following {{configuration}}
{code}
<licenses>
<license>
<family>MIT</family>
<notes />
<any>
<text>licensed under the MIT</text>
</any>
</license>
</licenses>
<families>
<family>
<id>MIT</id>
<name>MIT</name>
</family>
</families>
{code}
We have source file with following header
{code}
/*
* jQuery CSSEmoticons plugin 0.2.9
*
* Copyright (c) 2010 Steve Schwartz (JangoSteve)
*
* Dual licensed under the MIT and GPL licenses:
* http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php
* http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
*
* Date: Sun Oct 22 1:00:00 2010 -0500
*/
{code}
The line {{licensed under the MIT}} is in file, but the file is reported as
having unapproved license :(((
What am I doing wrong? :)
> Custom licensenses not working in contrast to v0.15
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: RAT-343
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-343
> Project: Apache Rat
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: license-meta-data, scan, site
> Affects Versions: 0.16
> Reporter: Philipp Ottlinger
> Priority: Major
>
> Due to the changes introduced in 0.16 projects with custom license
> definitions do not seem to work anymore as reported by [~solomax] with
> OpenMeetings:
> [https://github.com/apache/openmeetings/blob/master/pom.xml#L1393]
> Verify that the documentation provided in
> [https://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/examples/custom-license.html]
> is correct and ideally add an example usage to
> [CreadurExamples|https://github.com/ottlinger/creadur-rat-examples] to
> prevent future regressions.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
