+1 - all steps in the validation guideline passed OK. - successful build & integration tests for Hadoop 1 and Hadoop 2.
Cheers, Chris On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:45 AM, Rahul Sharma <[email protected]> wrote: > fuuuuuuuuuuu :( I completely missed the context there J > > Then I will go back to the school of signing and uploading the artifact. > > regards, > Rahul > > On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Harsh J <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Rahul - That was an april fools' joke I think. > > > > On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Rahul Sharma <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > Validated things against our guideline. I read sometime back that it is > > > good that more people sign the release. Can we use > > > https://whimsy.apache.org/committers/X_______ to do it ? A while back > > there > > > was a mail thread "*New code signing service*" from Daniel but people > > > raised doubts regarding the same. > > > > > > regards, > > > Rahul > > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Josh Wills <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > >> +1 from me. > > >> > > >> Thanks Matthias for the KEYS updates. I'll try to get myself plugged > > into > > >> the web of trust when I'm in Palo Alto next week. > > >> > > >> J > > >> > > >> > > >> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Matthias Friedrich <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> > +1 > > >> > > > >> > Followed our validation guideline (updated version), re-checked > > >> > licensing, built the source distribution for Hadoop 1 and ran unit > > >> > and integration tests. > > >> > > > >> > Since we're not connected to Apache's PGP web of trust, I have > created > > >> > signatures, appended them to Josh's and uploaded them here [1]. I > > think > > >> > it's a good idea in general to have signatures from more than one > > >> > person. > > >> > > > >> > Regards, > > >> > Matthias > > >> > > > >> > [1] http://people.apache.org/~mafr/apache-crunch-0.6.0-RC2/ > > >> > > > >> > On Wednesday, 2013-05-08, Tom White wrote: > > >> > > +1 > > >> > > > > >> > > I verified signatures and checksums, ran RAT, checked the tag > > against > > >> > > the contents of the src tarball, read LICENSE and NOTICE, built > from > > >> > > source and ran tests. > > >> > > > > >> > > Cheers, > > >> > > Tom > > >> > > > > >> > > On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Josh Wills <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >> > > > Hello, > > >> > > > > > >> > > > This is yet another call for a vote on releasing the following > > >> > candidate as > > >> > > > Apache Crunch 0.6.0. This will be our first release as an Apache > > TLP. > > >> > The > > >> > > > release fixes the following issues: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12313526&version=12324076 > > >> > > > > > >> > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. We need 3 PMC > member > > +1s > > >> > in > > >> > > > order to make the release. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Release artifacts: > > >> > > > http://people.apache.org/~jwills/crunch-0.6.0-RC2/ > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Maven staging repo: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecrunch-020/ > > >> > > > > > >> > > > The tag to be voted upon: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=crunch.git;a=tag;h=0116a9cfa1d1215c94368a778c1aa540307581af > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Crunch's KEYS file: > > >> > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/crunch/KEYS > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Thanks, > > >> > > > Josh > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Director of Data Science > > >> Cloudera <http://www.cloudera.com> > > >> Twitter: @josh_wills <http://twitter.com/josh_wills> > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Harsh J > > >
