[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRUNCH-276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13788244#comment-13788244
]
Sean Owen commented on CRUNCH-276:
----------------------------------
No problem, I will not change classes to final.
Right now I'm using IntelliJ's inspections, which are quite good. FindBugs has
some value. I know how to set up FindBugs as a report at least, so that it can
generate something like these results on demand but not go so far as to fail
the build. If that's of interest I can put that in the mix too.
> Apply static analysis fixes, improvements
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: CRUNCH-276
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRUNCH-276
> Project: Crunch
> Issue Type: Task
> Affects Versions: 0.7.0
> Reporter: Sean Owen
> Priority: Minor
>
> Browsing through the Crunch code with a static analyzer, I see a number of
> minor issues that can be cleaned up, even automatically, by the same tools.
> Most are likely completely non-controversial since they do not affect the
> functionality of the code:
> - Remove unused imports
> - Fix bad javadoc
> - Typos
> - Unnecessary casts
> - Redundant modifiers on interface methods
> - Access modifiers that have no effect (public constructor in private class)
> - Missing @Override, @ Deprecated
> - Bad literals like 0d
> Others are also likely uncontroversial although might be termed a matter of
> style, although the changes would be towards standard Sun style; for example:
> - Braces around all blocks
> - No unnecessarily final on locals
> - Unnecessarily inverted conditions
> Some are signature changes, although only for entirely private elements:
> - Making methods static
> - Type weakening
> - Remove use of old classes like Hashtable
> - Declare collections by interface
> - Raw use of generic types
> And finally, there are a few which could conceivably break a caller, but only
> if doing something unintended. I want to avoid these unless the likelihood of
> an issue is very remote:
> - Making utility classes final and non-instantiable -- should not be
> subclassed or instantiated
> Before I get way into this -- it will likely touch 200+ files -- thoughts? I
> believe Josh was broadly supportive but here are the specifics.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
