+1 to the variation without the "ear" hanging off the C. so this one ( http://99designs.com/logo-design/contests/only-thing-bigger-big-data-267436/entries/98 )
Projects like Cascading do not have an "elephant" in their logo so it is definitely not a requirement. On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Ashish <[email protected]> wrote: > Like the 2nd one > > http://99designs.com/logo-design/contests/only-thing-bigger-big-data-267436/entries/74 > > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Gabriel Reid <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Josh Wills <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I'm a bit torn and could use some help making the decision. The first > one > > > had the highest overall rating (3.6) and has both the pro and is very > > clear > > > about the connection between Crunch and Hadoop (which is either a good > > > thing or a bad thing, depending on your perspective.) But I like the > > > abstraction and the "pipeline" feel of the second design (3.5), and I > > think > > > it's more interesting because it's so different from the logos for > Hadoop > > > and the other ecosystem projects-- although if you want to make the > > > association clear, that's not necessarily a good thing. :) > > > > > > Any other thoughts before I pick a winner? > > > > I'm with you on the abstraction of and "pipeline" feel of the second > > design. > > > > I think that there are more than enough logos that try to fit an elephant > > in somewhere, and to me that's gotten kind of old. I also feel like the > > pipeline logo has a much clearer link with Crunch than the elephant- > > based one. > > > > - Gabriel > > > > > > -- > thanks > ashish > > Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog > My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal >
