[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRUNCH-366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13939199#comment-13939199
]
Sean Griffin commented on CRUNCH-366:
-------------------------------------
Actually, the changes might not be quite that simple since it appears the
parent POM (at least in master) also defines dependencies on Scala artifacts.
> Include scala base version in scrunch artifact
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CRUNCH-366
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRUNCH-366
> Project: Crunch
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Scrunch
> Reporter: Sean Griffin
> Priority: Minor
>
> CRUNCH-225 did most of the work to flex compiling against Scala 2.9 vs. 2.10,
> but the released artifacts are still against one version or the other and not
> both. Also, typically in the Scala community the Scala base version is
> included in the artifact so that it's clear exactly which Scala version it's
> compatible with.
> This is a simple change:
> 1. Change artifactId to be crunch-scrunch_${scala.base.version}
> 2. Add <scala.base.version>2.9</scala.base.version> to the scala-2.9.2 profile
> 3. Add <scala.base.version>2.10</scala.base.version> to the scala-2.10 profile
> Once these changes were made, when releasing scrunch you just have to release
> twice, once for each profile.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
