[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRUNCH-537?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gabriel Reid updated CRUNCH-537:
--------------------------------
Attachment: CRUNCH-537.patch
Patch to deprecate PIPELINE_PLAN_DOTFILE.
Probably more importantly, I noticed the mispelled DotfileUtills class name, so
renamed it to DotfileUtil, and deprecated DotfileUtills (and it delegates to
DotfileUtil). The deprecation is for backwards compatibility. Any thoughts on
whether I'm a) being too picky about spelling or b) worrying too much about
backwards compatibility?
> Deprecate use of PlanningParameters.PIPELINE_PLAN_DOTFILE
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CRUNCH-537
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRUNCH-537
> Project: Crunch
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Gabriel Reid
> Attachments: CRUNCH-537.patch
>
>
> In some cases, storing the (potentially large) job plan dotfile in the job
> Configuration object can cause some issues. Additionally, we now have a much
> better way of dealing with the dotfiles (by making it possible to simply set
> a directory where they will be written).
> We should deprecate {{PlanningParameters.PIPELINE_PLAN_DOTFILE}}, and remove
> it in another release or two. Instead of using the Configuration object to
> pass back the dotfile, the writing of dotfiles to an output directory should
> be the standard way of handling dot files.
> Related user list thread: http://s.apache.org/blH
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
