[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRUNCH-601?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15424778#comment-15424778
]
Mikael Goldmann commented on CRUNCH-601:
----------------------------------------
Oh, right, the fact that we emit something in cleanup() has no effect on the
size estimate, so we still short circuit away materializing the collection.
Isn't it a bit dangerous to treat getSize() == 0 as a guarantee that the
collection is empty?
> Short PCollections in SparkPipeline get length null.
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CRUNCH-601
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRUNCH-601
> Project: Crunch
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Spark
> Affects Versions: 0.13.0
> Environment: Running in local mode on Mac as well as in a ubuntu
> 14.04 docker container
> Reporter: Mikael Goldmann
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: CRUNCH-601.patch, SmallCollectionLengthTest.java
>
>
> I'll attach a file with a test that I would expect to pass but which fails.
> It creates five PCollection<String> of lengths 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 gets the
> lengths, runs the pipeline and prints the lengths. Finally it asserts that
> all lengths are non-null.
> I would expect it to print lengths 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and pass.
> What it does is print lengths null, null, null, 3, 4 and fail.
> I think the underlying reason is the use of getSize() on an unmaterialized
> object and assuming that when the estimate that getSize() returns is 0, then
> the PCollection is guaranteed to be empty, which is false in some cases.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
