good idea... FYI: Opened to track this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-197 Historically, Java has been pretty good about backwards compatibility, but I think we should still test and verify (not just cTAKES, but our dependencies as well).
--Pei > -----Original Message----- > From: Andy McMurry [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 3:35 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: supported java releases in current ctakes development and > future releases (3.1 and later) > > will this fit with the UIMA java compatibility? > > If so, +1 ! > > On May 23, 2013, at 11:06 AM, "Coarr, Matt" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I know there was a small discussion about documentation back in February > about including supported platforms in the developer guide and faq. And I > know that the ctakes 3.0 dev guide says that ctakes 3.0 requires java 6+. > > > > For new development (trunk and new ctakes releases), what's the status > of supported java platforms? > > > > Java 6 hit its "end of public updates" this past February, so there will be > > no > more security patches. > > > > Can java 7 features be used in new development? > > > > Thanks, > > Matt
