I think it would be great if you could do that Rob. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Pei Chen Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 1:54 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Converting cTAKES to UIMAfit
Agreed, There have been few good places where uimaFIT may be useful: Feel free to check out any existing items and add/create items: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-135?jql=project%20%3D%20CTAKES%20AND%20text%20~%20uimafit On the top of my head: 1) Type System detection 2) JCasUtil (selectCovered, etc.) 3) Input Parameter handling 4) Annotator, Pipeline instantiation/creation Note: There may be a valid use case to have a few default XML configurations (mainly in production use where you may want to swap configs without having to recompile code.) On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Robert Spurrier < [email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > Working with UIMAfit makes annotator/pipeline development a sheer joy. I > thouroughly dislike keeping track of annotator descriptors during > development. > > Is it worth converting cTAKES to use UIMAfit as exclusively as possible? I > would not mind taking on that responsibility if It meant blowing away as > many descriptors as possible =] > > Thanks, > Rob >
