vj,
Were you thinking of contributing the new ytext Word Sense Disambiguation 
component as well- I think that will be really cool.
--Pei

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Karthik
> Sarma
> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 1:05 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: move ytex annotators to ctakes.apache.org?
> 
> This would be quite valuable -- in particular, ytex's annotation database
> connection is much easier to use than what ships with cTAKES. There are a
> fair number of other advantages, and I think they'd all be very valuable!
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Karthik Sarma
> UCLA Medical Scientist Training Program Class of 20??
> Member, UCLA Medical Imaging & Informatics Lab Member, CA Delegation
> to the House of Delegates of the American Medical Association
> [email protected]
> gchat: [email protected]
> linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/ksarma
> 
> 
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 5:50 AM, vijay garla <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Hello All,
> >
> > I'd like to contribute ytex to ctakes.  YTEX's main feature is the
> > ability to store *any* ctakes (or uima) annotation in a relational
> > database (in a relational format), and the ability to export these
> > annotations to ML packages (weka, libsvm, matlab, R).  All of this is
> > purely declarative/via configuration.
> >
> > In addtion, Ytex provides the following:
> > * Negation Detection with Negex
> > * SegmentRegexAnnotator - section detection with regular expressions
> > * NamedEntityRegexAnnotator - named entity detection with regular
> > expressions
> > * Sentence Splitter - modified ctakes sentence splitter making
> > sentence split patterns configurable (not hardcoded to \n)
> >
> > YTEX currently works with ctakes 2.5; I would like to upgrade it to
> > the latest ctakes, and if the community is interested, contribute to
> > ctakes.apache.org.
> >
> > A licensing question: YTEX uses Spring (apache 2.0 license), Hibernate
> > (lgpl 2.1), & weka (gpl).  Are there any issues with including these?
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > vj
> >

Reply via email to