Im interested in hearing more about this.
John — Sent from Mailbox On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Miller, Timothy <[email protected]> wrote: > The typesystem has a few different basic relations: > Relation: The base type, it has no information about how many arguments > or what type of arguments it uses. > BinaryTextRelation: Between 2 RelationArgument objects, which are > wrappers for UIMA Annotation type (spanned arguments). > CollectionTextRelation: Between a set of RelationArgument objects > (Annotation) > ElementRelation: Between 2 Element objects, which are non-spanned types, > with pointers to mentions. > AttributeRelation: Between an Element and an Attribute, which is a type > of Element. > However, as far as I can tell there is no relation type which would > allow for a link between an Annotation and an Element. This use case > comes up in certain models of coreference resolution, where you attempt > to link new mentions back to clusters instead of to individual mentions. > I am interested in trying out models of this type and was going to > extend RelationExtractorAnnotator but I think the typesystem doesn't > have what we need for this case. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, > but I would propose to modify the typesystem to make such relations > possible. > Thanks > Tim
