Tomasz, Yes, please please feel free to open a Jira ticket for this. Also, Be sure to include the version of the cTAKES and pipeline you're using. It is possible that the new Subject Classifier isn't classifying this...
-----Original Message----- From: Tomasz Oliwa [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 2:50 PM To: [email protected] Subject: UmlsConcept subject Hi, I think there is a regression in the way cTAKES discovers the subject status ("patient", "familiy_member", etc.) of an UmlsConcept. Using cTAKES 3.2.2 and the AggregatePlaintextFastUMLSProcessor in the CVD: 1. "Patient's brother has a myocardial infarction." "myocardial infarction" and "infarction" have subject = "patient" 2. "Father had a myocardial infarction." "myocardial infarction" and "infarction" have subject = "patient" 3. "Sister was diagnosed with a myocardial infarction." "myocardial infarction" and "infarction" have subject = "patient" 4. "Family member had a myocardial infarction." "myocardial infarction" and "infarction" have subject = "family_member" (this is correct) I am looking at the code of the SubjectCleartkAnalysisEngine. Is this the class responsible for inferring the subject? How can this be fixed? Should I open a JIRA ticket? Thanks, Tomasz
