Hi Alex,

I tried out a fresh checkout from SVN and git. Tried a full build in both 
setups and DateAnnotatorTest fails consistently for me. Did you changed build 
order or something in pom to fix it?

Regards,
Gandhi


-----Original Message-----
From: Gandhi Rajan Natarajan [mailto:gandhi.natara...@arisglobal.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2017 2:47 AM
To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: RE: YTEX Assistance required RE: Test case failure [EXTERNAL]

Thanks for the info Alex. Will check and keep you posted.

Regards,
Gandhi


-----Original Message-----
From: Alexandru Zbarcea [mailto:zbarce...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2017 2:29 AM
To: Apache cTAKES Dev <dev@ctakes.apache.org>
Subject: Re: YTEX Assistance required RE: Test case failure [EXTERNAL]

Hi Gandhi,

I saw the same thing on the cTAKES-trunk-Java-1.8 build #38 [1]. I also 
encountered the issue few times, and is very inconsistent, without being able 
to track it down.

It seems that ytexDates.iterator() is empty in certain conditions. I think is 
related to the order of executions and how resources are generated. On the last 
builds I couldn't reproduce it.

So I suggest a full:
    mvn clean install

Alex

[1] -
https://builds.apache.org/view/C/view/Apache%20cTAKES/job/cTAKES-trunk-Java-1.8/38/org.apache.ctakes$ctakes-ytex-uima/testReport/org.apache.ctakes.ytex.uima.annotators/DateAnnotatorTest/testParseDate/


On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Finan, Sean < 
sean.fi...@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:

> Is anybody that was involved with ytex still out there?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gandhi Rajan Natarajan [mailto:gandhi.natara...@arisglobal.com]
> Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2017 9:53 AM
> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
> Subject: Test case failure [EXTERNAL]
>
> Hi All,
>
> I did a fresh check out of cTAKES code from SVN to work on Spring
> upgrade patch. But I have one failed test case in ctakes-ytex-uima
> module. The error trace is as follows,
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------------
> Test set: org.apache.ctakes.ytex.uima.annotators.DateAnnotatorTest
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------------
> Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.583
> sec <<< FAILURE!
> testParseDate(org.apache.ctakes.ytex.uima.annotators.DateAnnotatorTest
> )
> Time elapsed: 0.547 sec  <<< FAILURE!
> java.lang.AssertionError
>                 at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:86)
>                 at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:41)
>                 at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:52)
>                 at org.apache.ctakes.ytex.uima.
> annotators.DateAnnotatorTest.testParseDate(DateAnnotatorTest.java:54)
>                 at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
> Method)
>                 at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>                 at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>                 at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>                 at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.
> runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
>                 at org.junit.internal.runners.
> model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
>                 at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.
> invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
>                 at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.
> evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
>                 at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(
> ParentRunner.java:271)
>                 at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:70)
>                 at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50)
>                 at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(
> ParentRunner.java:238)
>                 at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(
> ParentRunner.java:63)
>                 at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(
> ParentRunner.java:236)
>                 at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(
> ParentRunner.java:53)
>                 at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(
> ParentRunner.java:229)
>                 at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.
> java:309)
>                 at org.apache.maven.surefire.
> junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:249)
>                 at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.
> executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:142)
>                 at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(
> JUnit4Provider.java:113)
>                 at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
> Method)
>                 at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>                 at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>                 at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>                 at org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.
> invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189)
>                 at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$
> ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165)
>                 at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.
> invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85)
>                 at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.
> runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:104)
>                 at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(
> ForkedBooter.java:75)
>
> Am I missing something or is it broken recently?
>
> Regards,
> Gandhi
>
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are 
> addressed.
> If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate,
> distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender or system
> manager by email immediately if you have received this e-mail by
> mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the
> intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying,
> distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this
> information is strictly prohibited and against the law.
>
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy 
this e-mail. Please notify the sender or system manager by email immediately if 
you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your 
system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, 
copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this 
information is strictly prohibited and against the law.
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy 
this e-mail. Please notify the sender or system manager by email immediately if 
you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your 
system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, 
copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this 
information is strictly prohibited and against the law.

Reply via email to