Hi Richard and David, Thank you for your support and suggestions. As you correctly identified, upgrading UIMA to 2.4.0 has been made without issues ([1] or [2]).
Sean, Tim, I look forward to your feedback related to latest commits. Let me know if you see something out of order. I also know that you have cTAKES integrated into different projects and I wouldn't like to break them. I know that community's integration stability is very important. That is why I am currently looking in fixing the integration tests which it seems that they were left behind. Some modules' pom.xml are explicitly setting them to be skipped. This is why the Jenkins job ctakes-trunk-compiletest succeeds and cTAKES-trunk-Java-1.8 fails. Alex [1] - git: https://github.com/apache/ctakes/commit/1655d78184afddf230a8f8cdf5ff06ebbabd80fb [2] - svn: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ctakes/trunk/?p=1816776 [3] - https://builds.apache.org/view/C/view/Apache%20cTAKES/job/ctakes-trunk-compiletest/ [4] - https://builds.apache.org/view/C/view/Apache%20cTAKES/job/cTAKES-trunk-Java-1.8/ On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 8:06 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho <r...@apache.org> wrote: > The uimaFIT releases mainly fix bugs and add smaller features. > It should be pretty safe to update to 2.4.0. I didn't face > any problems upgrading e.g. DKPro Core which is pretty large > and uses uimaFIT intensively. > > Cheers, > > -- Richard (atm maintaining uimaFIT) > > > On 28.11.2017, at 01:45, David Kincaid <kincaid.d...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Thanks for upgrading uimafit. I was thinking of giving it a try myself > when > > I had a chance. I see that you upgrades to 2.30, but the most recent > > version is 2.4.0. Was there a problem with 2.4.0? > > > > - Dave > >
