Just for you Jordan, I signed up for Quora :P
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Jordan Zimmerman < [email protected]> wrote: > http://www.quora.com/What-is-semantic-versioning > > Please, enlighten the world :) > > -Jordan > > From: Jordan Zimmerman <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> > Reply: Jordan Zimmerman <[email protected]>> > <[email protected]> > Date: July 29, 2014 at 7:17:43 PM > To: [email protected] <[email protected]>> > <[email protected]>, Eric Tschetter <[email protected]>> > <[email protected]> > > Cc: Cameron McKenzie <[email protected]>> <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Fix for CURATOR-42 > > Actually, that helps a lot. It’s the best explanation I’ve read. Given > that, it’s correct to move to 2.7.0 because of the CuratorFrameworkFactory > change. > > It’s so good, you should post that somewhere. Quora maybe? > > -JZ > > From: Eric Tschetter <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > Reply: [email protected] <[email protected]>> > <[email protected]> > Date: July 29, 2014 at 6:43:57 PM > To: [email protected] <[email protected]>> > <[email protected]> > Cc: Cameron McKenzie <[email protected]>> <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Fix for CURATOR-42 > > Jordan, quick semantic versioning tutorial: > > If you have 1.0.0 and 1.0.1, you can use either one and you will not > run into errors due to API conflicts (i.e. no ClassNotFound or > NoSuchMethod type exceptions) > > If you have 1.0.0 and 1.1.0, you can replace 1.0.0 with 1.1.0 and you > will not have errors due to API conflicts. If you try to swap 1.0.0 > in place of something that depends on 1.1.0, however, you *might* have > errors due to API conflicts. I.e. you can go forward without errors, > but not backwards > > If you have 1.0.0 and 2.0.0, you will likely have errors due to API > conflicts if you replace either one with the other. > > Hope that helps, if not, feel free to completely ignore me :) > > --Eric > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Jordan Zimmerman > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Though, the api change is backward compatible. Frankly, semantic > versioning confuses me most of the time. > > > > -JZ > > > > From: Cameron McKenzie <[email protected]> > > Reply: Cameron McKenzie <[email protected]>> > > Date: July 29, 2014 at 5:15:49 PM > > To: Jordan Zimmerman <[email protected]>> > > Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>> > > Subject: Re: Fix for CURATOR-42 > > > > Ok, thanks. Also, have we decided against doing a 2.6.1? I noticed that > this version is gone and only 2.7.0 is available. > > cheers > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Jordan Zimmerman < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Next time just create a PR - I made one. Looks good to me. > > > > -JZ > > > > From: Cameron McKenzie <[email protected]> > > Reply: [email protected] <[email protected]>>, > [email protected] <[email protected]>> > > Date: July 29, 2014 at 5:09:56 PM > > To: [email protected] <[email protected]>> > > Subject: Fix for CURATOR-42 > > > > I've just committed a fix for CURATOR-42. Can someone give it a review > > please? > > cheers > > Cam > > > >
