[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14078715#comment-14078715
]
Cameron McKenzie commented on CURATOR-106:
------------------------------------------
I have had a look at this as well, and I don't think that it can recurse
because the client.delete().guaranteed().inBackground().forPath(path) call
shouldn't ever throw an exception because it's running in the background.
I think that this can be closed.
> Issuing a guaranteed delete can cause stack overflow if ZK is not reachable
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CURATOR-106
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-106
> Project: Apache Curator
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Framework
> Affects Versions: 2.4.2
> Reporter: Jasdeep Hundal
> Fix For: awaiting-response
>
>
> For guaranteed deletes (eg. lock releases) that fail, the FailedDeleteManager
> issues another guaranteed delete here:
> https://github.com/apache/curator/blob/master/curator-framework/src/main/java/org/apache/curator/framework/imps/FailedDeleteManager.java#L35
> In an environment where ZK has the potential to be down for an extended
> period of time, this has the potential to recurse until there is a stack
> overflow (particularly if the application is using multiple locks.)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
