Github user dragonsinth commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/curator/pull/41#discussion_r16851906
--- Diff:
curator-recipes/src/main/java/org/apache/curator/framework/recipes/cache/TreeCache.java
---
@@ -580,13 +670,33 @@ public Void apply(TreeCacheListener listener)
}
/**
- * Default behavior is just to log the exception
- *
- * @param e the exception
+ * Send an exception to any listeners, or else log the error if there
are none.
*/
- protected void handleException(Throwable e)
+ private void handleException(final Throwable e)
{
- LOG.error("", e);
+ if ( errorListeners.size() == 0 )
+ {
+ LOG.error("", e);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ errorListeners.forEach(new Function<UnhandledErrorListener,
Void>()
+ {
+ @Override
+ public Void apply(UnhandledErrorListener listener)
+ {
+ try
+ {
+ listener.unhandledError("", e);
+ }
+ catch ( Exception e )
+ {
+ LOG.error("Exception handling exception", e);
+ }
+ return null;
+ }
+ });
+ }
--- End diff --
Which part, having unhandledError listeners attached to a recipe? Logging
to error only when there are no listeners?
Another option I considered is somehow making the recipe fire the unhandled
error through the CuratorFramework's unhandledError listeners. But I wasn't
sure if that was a good idea or not. WDTY?
My immediate need is to ensure during tests that no unhandled errors fire.
I was doing that via subclass but I was unhappy about that approach since I
want to use the Builder in tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
