Is there a Jira for this fix? -JZ
On January 16, 2015 at 12:47:51 AM, Scott Blum ([email protected]) wrote: +0 FYI, I just pushed a fix to the new TreeCache. It wasn't properly handling the case where the root node was deleted then re-created, which seems pretty problematic for the single-node (max depth 0) case. On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Jay Zarfoss <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Eric Tschetter <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Cameron McKenzie > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > Tests are all good for me now. > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Jordan Zimmerman < > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hello, > > >> > > >> This is the 2nd vote for Apache Curator version 2.7.1 > > >> > > >> *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours > > >> > > >> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are > > >> provided for convenience. > > >> > > >> Link to release notes: > > >> > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12328938 > > > >> > > >> Staging repo: > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.7.1/ > > >> > > >> Binary artifacts: > > >> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1009/ > > >> > > >> The tag to be voted upon: > > >> > > >> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=ba9fb60c5463e21199cb8719cc537ccf8a7f2a1e > > > >> > > >> Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: > > >> http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS > > >> > > >> [ ] +1 approve > > >> [ ] +0 no opinion > > >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > >> > > >
