I see it:

> On Oct 25, 2015, at 10:44 PM, Cameron McKenzie <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I'm having some issues with getting Nexus to work. I can see that the
> orgapachecurator-1019
> repo is present and has the right artefacts but I can't see it via the
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ link. Any ideas?
> 
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Cameron McKenzie <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
>> Thanks Jordan, will give that a spin.
>> 
>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Use the versions plugin to set back to whatever version you need:
>>> 
>>>        mvn versions:set -DnewVersion=2.9.1-SNAPSHOT
>>> 
>>> It does some work and then you commit it via:
>>> 
>>>        mvn versions:commit
>>> 
>>> Believe it or not, this doesn’t go a git commit :) So, commit that:
>>> 
>>>        git commit -a -m “Back to 2.9.1-SNAPSHOT”
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Oct 25, 2015, at 8:40 PM, Cameron McKenzie <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> The master branch is currently in a bit of a bogus state due to the
>>> backed
>>>> out release last week. Do I need to manually go and change the versions
>>> in
>>>> the pom.xml in each sub project to fix things up? I was expecting the
>>>> release target to just overwrite things, but it generated artefacts
>>> with a
>>>> 2.9.2 tag even though I explicitly asked for a 2.9.1 version.
>>>> cheers
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Yeah - let me look into that one.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Oct 21, 2015, at 1:16 AM, Cameron McKenzie <[email protected]
>>>> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Should we be holding off on this build until CURATOR-274 is
>>> investigated?
>>>>>> Looks like it could be a bit of a show stopper?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Cameron McKenzie <
>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Ok thanks, will give it a spin when I get a minute.
>>>>>>> cheers
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> It may be because the <scm> tag is messed up. I noticed it in the
>>> 3.0.0
>>>>>>>> branch and fixed it there. Change the <scm> tag to HEAD.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> -Jordan
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Oct 20, 2015, at 9:13 PM, Cameron McKenzie <
>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> The current release process seems to be creating a
>>>>>>>> CURATOR-2.9.1-SNAPSHOT
>>>>>>>>> tag. Is that expected? I notice that there are both 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT
>>> and
>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>> 3.0.0 tags, but for all the prior releases, there is no SNAPSHOT
>>> tag.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Have I stuff something up? I just used the standard release process
>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>> the wiki:
>>>>>>>>> mvn -P apache-release release:prepare
>>>>>>>>> mvn -P apache-release release:perform
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> So, the tag doesn't match what the wiki steps involve for doing the
>>>>>>>>> checkout in git to do the actual release. Should I just manually
>>>>> create
>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>> tag without the -SNAPSHOT suffix? Or should I be redoing the
>>> release
>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> some other manner?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> cheers
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Cameron McKenzie <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I will start looking at a 2.9.1 release.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 1:53 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> I moved the 1 remaining issue out to the next release. Can one of
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> other committers start on 2.9.1?
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> -Jordan
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 20, 2015, at 1:54 AM, Flaath, Jaran <
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Just wondering if there is any ETA on version 2.9.1 of Curator?
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jaran Flaath
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to