Yes, that’s correct. It’s a patch against master. I’ll do the merge if you’re OK with it.
-Jordan > On Jun 5, 2016, at 6:42 PM, Cameron McKenzie <[email protected]> wrote: > > hey Jordan, > The fix for CURATOR-335 looks good to me, but I'm wondering if it should > actually be applied against master and then merged into 3.0? > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Jordan Zimmerman < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> no worries - get well. >> >>> On Jun 2, 2016, at 9:20 PM, Cameron McKenzie <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks for sorting this out Jordan. I'm pretty sick today so won't get >>> around to looking at it, but I will try over the weekend or really next >> week >>> On 3 Jun 2016 7:05 AM, "Jordan Zimmerman" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>> It sounds like curator is using a different algorithm since it has >>>>> nodes sorting their position to determine if they have a lease or not. >>>> >>>> No - I just added that as I thought there was a bug. But, now I realize >>>> I’m wrong. So, it was correct all along. Thanks Ben. >>>> >>>> -Jordan >> >>
