Done, have created a PR. On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Cameron McKenzie <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yep, I will try and do it tomorrow > On 13 Jun 2016 1:19 PM, "Jordan Zimmerman" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Sure - you OK doing it? >> >> > On Jun 12, 2016, at 10:09 PM, Cameron McKenzie <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > It could probably just be the remaining amount of time until session >> > timeout couldn't it? We should know at what time the last event was as >> we >> > use this to calculate when the list event occurs >> > On 13 Jun 2016 12:54 PM, "Jordan Zimmerman" <[email protected] >> > >> > wrote: >> > >> >> Yeah - that was my thinking but, really, it could be done more often. >> >> Maybe 1/3 instead of 2/3? It wouldn’t do any harm really. Just as long >> as >> >> it doesn’t turn into a spin loop. >> >> >> >> -Jordan >> >> >> >>> On Jun 7, 2016, at 2:13 AM, Cameron McKenzie <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Jordan, do you remember what the rationale behind only waiting for >> 2/3 of >> >>> the session timeout is? It's something to do with the way that ZK >> itself >> >>> handles session timeouts isn't it? Does ZK timeout the session if it >> >> hasn't >> >>> received a heartbeat for 2/3 of the session timeout? I can't remember. >> >>> cheers >> >> >> >> >> >>
