Go figure the ER doctor is unsympathetic over the flu...  Tougher because
the kids are both sick...

On Feb 10, 2018 6:54 AM, "Jordan Zimmerman" <jor...@jordanzimmerman.com>
wrote:

> My hero!!!! Thanks man - get well soon! Your wife is a doctor - can't she
> give you a magic pill?
>
> -Jordan
>
> > On Feb 10, 2018, at 9:52 AM, Jay Zarfoss <zarf...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Sorry for the delay -- it's a mess over here we're all down with the flu.
> >
> > Thx,
> > Jay
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 3:25 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> jor...@jordanzimmerman.com <mailto:jor...@jordanzimmerman.com>
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> Only great if we get another vote :D PLEASE committers - vote.
> >>
> >> -JZ
> >>
> >>> On Feb 9, 2018, at 6:24 PM, kenneth mcfarland <
> >> kennethpmcfarl...@gmail.com <mailto:kennethpmcfarl...@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Awesome this is great!! Thanks Mr. Zimmerman.
> >>>
> >>> On Feb 9, 2018 3:21 PM, "Jordan Zimmerman" <jor...@jordanzimmerman.com
> <mailto:jor...@jordanzimmerman.com>
> >> <mailto:jor...@jordanzimmerman.com <mailto:jor...@jordanzimmerman.com
> >>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Please folks - we just need one more +1. If at all possible, please
> >> vote.
> >>>>
> >>>> -Jordan
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Feb 7, 2018, at 7:08 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <randg...@apache.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is the vote for Apache Curator version 4.0.1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
> provided
> >>>> for convenience.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Link to release notes:
> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> >>>> projectId=12314425&version=12341261 <https://issues.apache.org/ <
> >> https://issues.apache.org/ <https://issues.apache.org/>>
> >>>> jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12341261>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Staging repo:
> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/4.0.1/ <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/4.0.1/> <
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/4.0.1/ <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/4.0.1/>> <
> >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/4.0.1/ <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/4.0.1/> <
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/4.0.1/ <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/4.0.1/>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Binary artifacts:
> >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/> <
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/>>
> >>>> orgapachecurator-1043/ <https://repository.apache <
> https://repository.apache/> <
> >> https://repository.apache/ <https://repository.apache/>>.
> >>>> org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1043/>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The tag to be voted upon:
> >>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h= <
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=> <
> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h= <
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=>>
> >>>> 23633e257add3f4b6e3d065f863e6125778f38d1 <https://git-wip-us.apache <
> https://git-wip-us.apache/> <
> >> https://git-wip-us.apache/ <https://git-wip-us.apache/>>.
> >>>> org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=23633e257add3f4b6e3d065f863e61
> >>>> 25778f38d1>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> >>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS <http://www.apache.org/dist/
> curator/KEYS> <http://www.apache.org/dist/ <http://www.apache.org/dist/>
> >> curator/KEYS> <http://www.apache.org/dist/ <http://www.apache.org/dist/>
> <http://www.apache.org/dist/ <http://www.apache.org/dist/>>
> >>>> curator/KEYS>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [ ] +1  approve
> >>>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
> >>>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> NOTE on testing. I've successfully run all the tests but, as we all
> >>>> know, the tests can be flakey. Please re-run any failed tests if
> needed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Jordan
>
>

Reply via email to