Thank you all, In my experience Curator is very much used in the ZooKeeper ecosystem. Probably many people have Apache Curator in their stack and they even do not know. I am currently trying to upgrade ZK to the latest version (3.6.x) in a few projects (in Apache BookKeeper and Pulsar for instance) and always I get into Curator that is to be upgraded.
I see people using it for the recipes and also a very good value is perceived for the TestingServer, because it makes it super easy to start the ZK server for tests. Probably we should try to find a way to get more feedback from our users as already said in this thread, ZooKeeper is very stable and Curator follows this line, this is why we do not have much activity on the ML. Enrico Il giorno mer 25 nov 2020 alle ore 00:58 Jordan Zimmerman < jor...@jordanzimmerman.com> ha scritto: > I appreciate that positive perspective. Thank you. > > -Jordan > > > On Nov 24, 2020, at 6:23 PM, Tamas Penzes <tam...@cloudera.com.INVALID> > wrote: > > > > I think Curator has the same problem as ZooKeeper: it works well, not too > > many things to do. (Even when I see more activity recently on ZooKeeper.) > > > > This is why we don't see too much activity on the mailing lists and also > > from committers. Why to change something that works? > > Pace of releases looks good to me, as Curator mostly follows ZooKeeper > > releases. That looks to be a good option. > > The big question is if Curator needs a new release for a new ZooKeeper > > release or not, because then Curator might have even less releases in the > > future. > > > > I personally wanted to do more things after the jUnit5 migration, but am > > quite busy right now and I'm only working on ZooKeeper or Curator as a > > hobby project to release stress. > > (I should do more. ;-)) > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 10:05 PM Cameron McKenzie < > cammcken...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > >> Agreed with all your points Jordan, > >> While my employer is still using Curator, I'm no longer actively > involved > >> in the project. > >> cheers > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 6:03 AM Jordan Zimmerman < > >> jor...@jordanzimmerman.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>>> 1) Mailing lists > >>> > >>> Not much activity. There used to be more questions/comments. I've sent > >>> several emails with questions/ideas in the past year that have gotten > no > >>> response at all other than from other committers. > >>> > >>>> 2) Recent activity from committers > >>> > >>> We have a good group of committers. But, none of us are using Curator > in > >>> their day jobs anymore. Has Curator gone into retirement? I know there > >> are > >>> company's using it but they don't tend to take any role in the project. > >>> > >>>> 3) Recent activity from new contributors > >>> > >>> We tend to get bug reports and then the reporters wait for solutions. > Or > >>> we get PRs that are hard to review or unclear. That said, there have > been > >>> some good submissions as well. > >>> > >>>> 4) Pace of the releases > >>> > >>> We had a good spell moving to 5.0.0 but things have nearly stopped now. > >>> > >>> -JZ > >>> > >>>> On Nov 24, 2020, at 11:38 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hello folks, > >>>> I would like to take a little survey and check the current state of > the > >>>> project. > >>>> > >>>> Can you please share your thoughts about these points ? > >>>> > >>>> 1) Mailing lists > >>>> 2) Recent activity from committers > >>>> 3) Recent activity from new contributors > >>>> 4) Pace of the releases > >>>> > >>>> Feel free to add any point to the list. > >>>> > >>>> Best regards > >>>> Enrico > >>> > >>> > >> > >
