XComp commented on code in PR #430:
URL: https://github.com/apache/curator/pull/430#discussion_r969545913


##########
curator-recipes/src/test/java/org/apache/curator/framework/recipes/leader/TestLeaderLatch.java:
##########
@@ -218,6 +218,56 @@ public void testWatchedNodeDeletedOnReconnect() throws 
Exception
         }
     }
 
+    @Test
+    public void 
testLeadershipElectionWhenNodeDisappearsAfterChildrenAreRetrieved() throws 
Exception
+    {
+        final String latchPath = "/foo/bar";
+        final Timing2 timing = new Timing2();
+        try (CuratorFramework client = 
CuratorFrameworkFactory.newClient(server.getConnectString(), timing.session(), 
timing.connection(), new RetryOneTime(1)))
+        {
+            client.start();
+            LeaderLatch latchInitialLeader = new LeaderLatch(client, 
latchPath, "initial-leader");
+            LeaderLatch latchCandidate0 = new LeaderLatch(client, latchPath, 
"candidate-0");
+            LeaderLatch latchCandidate1 = new LeaderLatch(client, latchPath, 
"candidate-1");
+
+            try
+            {
+                latchInitialLeader.start();
+
+                // we want to make sure that the leader gets leadership before 
other instances joining the party
+                waitForALeader(Collections.singletonList(latchInitialLeader), 
new Timing());
+
+                // candidate #0 will wait for the leader to go away - this 
should happen after the child nodes are retrieved by candidate #0
+                latchCandidate0.debugCheckLeaderShipLatch = new 
CountDownLatch(1);
+
+                latchCandidate0.start();
+                timing.sleepABit();
+
+                // no extract CountDownLatch needs to be set here because 
candidate #1 will rely on candidate #0
+                latchCandidate1.start();
+                timing.sleepABit();

Review Comment:
   ```suggestion
                   assertNull(latchCandidate0.getOurPath());
                   assertNull(latchCandidate1.getOurPath());
   
                   latchCandidate0.start();
                   latchCandidate1.start();
   
                   Awaitility.await("Wait for the candidates to have a path 
assigned to them.")
                       .pollInterval(Duration.ofMillis(100))
                       .pollInSameThread()
                       .until(() -> latchCandidate0.getOurPath() != null && 
latchCandidate1.getOurPath() != null);
   ```
   Would that work? The `LeaderLatch#ourPath` is set after the child is 
created. WDYT?



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@curator.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to